Recently Viewed Apartments
Click the
to Save
| Download in PDF for a more readable, printer-friendly option |
On behalf of The Real Estate Group, I am pleased to present the January 2009 edition of our Manhattan Rental Market Report, the only research on the city’s rental rates published on a monthly basis.
Despite the negative end to 2008, as the new year begins, the collective mood here at TREGNY is both excited and hopeful for the Manhattan rental market. So, I am happy to report that there is at least some good news to be had this month.
In direct response to the concessions and price drops that landlords have been offering, vacancies have dropped in doorman buildings almost 7% and 1.27% overall since December. This is the first reduction in vacancies in doorman units since September. These numbers illustrate that offering incentives and being diligent about reducing rents when appropriate is a successful strategy for absorbing inventory. At the same time, it comes as little surprise that non–doorman vacancies are continuing to rise, up another 8.45% since December, as landlords with these units seem to be less willing to be as aggressive with their concession offerings.
However while there is good news this month, there continues to be reminders of the downward pressure Manhattan is experiencing. Rents are still down across the board in both month–to–month and year–over–year comparisons. These numbers reinforce that landlords and property owners should remain vigilant in filling their vacancies via concessions and price drops, especially those with large numbers of vacant units.
Finally, I am optimistic that the negative news of this earnings season may actually be a blessing in disguise for the rental market. With the outpouring of luxury rentals on the market, I am hopeful that the lower bonuses realized this year will increase the demand for higher–end rental units and allow the rental market to gain some ground.
Sincerely,

Daniel Baum, C.O.O.
The Real Estate Group
|
Non–doorman Buildings (Average Prices)
|
||
|
Most Expensive
|
Least Expensive
|
|
|
Studios
|
TriBeCa $2,621
|
Harlem $1,205
|
|
One–bedrooms
|
TriBeCa $3,701
|
Harlem $1,622
|
|
Two–bedrooms
|
TriBeCa $6,144
|
Harlem $2,056
|
|
Doorman Buildings (Average Prices)
|
||
|
Most Expensive
|
Least Expensive
|
|
|
Studios
|
TriBeCa $2,728
|
Harlem $1,276
|
|
One–bedrooms
|
SoHo $4,983
|
Harlem $1,805
|
|
Two–bedrooms
|
SoHo $7,124
|
Harlem $2,508
|
|
Non–doorman Citywide Rents: January ’08 vs. January ’09
|
|||
|
January ’08
|
January ’09
|
Change
|
|
|
Studios
|
$2,029
|
$1,931
|
-4.82%
|
|
One–bedrooms
|
$2,807
|
$2,612
|
-6.96%
|
|
Two–bedrooms
|
$3,919
|
$3,659
|
-6.64%
|
|
Doorman Citywide Rents: January ’08 vs. January ’09
|
|||
|
January ’08
|
January ’09
|
Change
|
|
|
Studios
|
$2,608
|
$2,383
|
-8.63%
|
|
One–bedrooms
|
$3,634
|
$3,453
|
-4.97%
|
|
Two–bedrooms
|
$5,338
|
$5,187
|
-2.84%
|
Manhattan’s Benchmark Takes a Beating— It seems that no neighborhood is immune to the price drops Manhattan is seeing. Even TriBeCa, the symbol of expensive rents in Manhattan, has taken a hit over the past year. Rents have dropped as much as 21% in year–over–year comparisons for non–doorman one–bedrooms and 5.3% overall.
Manhattan Rains Luxury— A combination of condo buildings turning rental and consumers opting to downsize has left a glut of high–end units on the market in Manhattan – especially in neighborhoods such as TriBeCa and SoHo. While we observed this trend in 2008, the breadth of price points and options available now is far greater than anything we have observed in the past two years.
Keeping Hope Alive— All is not lost Manhattan! The improvement in vacancy rates we observed this month (down 1.27% overall and 6.98% in doorman buildings) prove that the rental market can be moved via appropriate pricing and incentives. As landlords and property owners make adjustments, renters are moving to make deals – and that’s good news for everyone.
Harlem—
Non–doorman (4.54%), doorman studios (1.60%), non-doorman one–bedrooms (3.58%), non-doorman two–bedrooms (6.90%)
Upper West Side—
Non–doorman (2.71%), doorman studios (2.57%), non-doorman one–bedrooms (1.03%), doorman one–bedrooms (2.71%), non-doorman two–bedrooms (0.01%), doorman two–bedrooms (7.49%)
Upper East Side—
Non–doorman (0.35%), non-doorman one–bedrooms (1.21%), doorman one–bedrooms (0.88%), non-doorman two–bedrooms (4.36%)
Midtown West—
Non–doorman (4.82%), doorman one–bedrooms (1.07%), non-doorman two–bedrooms (4.11%), doorman two–bedrooms (2.89%)
Midtown East—
Non-doorman one–bedrooms (4.67%), doorman two–bedrooms (4.21%)
Murray Hill—
Non–doorman (2.86%), doorman studios (4.75%), non-doorman one–bedrooms (1.03%), doorman one–bedrooms (3.84%), non-doorman two–bedrooms (2.85%), doorman two–bedrooms (7.32%)
Chelsea—
Non–doorman (2.36%), doorman studios (5.26%), doorman two–bedrooms (4.27%)
Gramercy Park—
Doorman studios (4.09%), non-doorman two–bedrooms (2.71%), doorman two–bedrooms (5.38%)
Greenwich Village—
Non–doorman (1.57%), non-doorman one–bedrooms (0.52%), non-doorman two–bedrooms (4.51%)
East Village—
Non–doorman (4.74%), doorman studios (5.24%), non-doorman one–bedrooms (3.87%), non-doorman two–bedrooms (0.75%), doorman two–bedrooms (7.40%)
SoHo—
Non–doorman (9.08%), doorman studios (1.96%), non-doorman one–bedrooms (5.86%), non-doorman two–bedrooms (4.43%)
Lower East Side—
Non–doorman (6.10%), non-doorman one–bedrooms (0.91%), doorman one–bedrooms (7.85%), doorman two–bedrooms (10.56%)
TriBeCa—
Non–doorman (4.43%), doorman studios (9.35%), non-doorman one–bedrooms (8.41%), non-doorman two–bedrooms (6.83%)
Financial District—
Non–doorman (5.99%), doorman two–bedrooms (2.36%)
Battery Park City—
Doorman one–bedrooms (0.23%), doorman two–bedrooms (5.29%)
Harlem—
Doorman one–bedrooms (0.13%), doorman two–bedrooms (5.03%)
Upper East Side—
Doorman studios (1.53%), doorman two–bedrooms (0.57%)
Midtown West—
Doorman studios (1.06%), non–doorman one–bedrooms (0.12%)
Midtown East—
Non–doorman studios (3.78%), doorman studios (1.96%), doorman one–bedrooms (0.90%), non–doorman two–bedrooms (3.23%)
Chelsea—
Non–doorman one–bedrooms (2.63%), doorman one–bedrooms (0.13%), non–doorman two–bedrooms (4.83%)
Gramercy Park—
Non–doorman studios (2.24%), non–doorman one–bedrooms (0.43%)
Greenwich Village—
Doorman studios (6.06%), doorman one–bedrooms (2.81%), doorman two–bedrooms (0.97%)
East Village—
Doorman one–bedrooms (2.71%)
SoHo—
Doorman one–bedrooms (2.01%), doorman two–bedrooms (5.24%)
Lower East Side—
Doorman studios (5.21%), non–doorman two–bedrooms (5.61%)
TriBeCa—
Doorman one–bedrooms (1.96%), doorman two–bedrooms (1.81%)
Financial District—
Doorman studios (0.99%), non–doorman one–bedrooms (8.53%), doorman one–bedrooms (1.87%), non–doorman two–bedrooms (7.44%)
Battery Park City—
Doorman studios (0.54%)
The Mean Rental Price graphs illustrate average monthly rents for studios, one–bedrooms and two–bedrooms in doorman and non–doorman buildings in Manhattan for the month of January 2009. Graphs tracking citywide and neighborhood price changes over a rolling 13-month period follow.




















































The Manhattan Rental Market Report is the only report that compares fluctuation in the city’s rental data on a monthly basis. It is an essential tool for potential renters seeking transparency in the NYC apartment market and a benchmark for landlords to efficiently and fairly adjust individual property rents in Manhattan.
The Manhattan Rental Market Report is based on data cross-sectioned from over 10,000 currently available listings located below 155th Street and priced under $10,000, with ultra-luxury property omitted to obtain a true monthly rental average. Our data is aggregated from the TREGNY proprietary database and sampled from a specific mid-month point to record current rental rates offered by landlords during that particular month. It is then combined with information from the REBNY Real Estate Listings Source (RLS), OnLine Residential (OLR.com) and R.O.L.E.X. (Real Plus).
Contact us now: 212.475.9000
Note: All market data is collected and compiled by The Real Estate Group’s marketing department and is overseen by C.O.O. Daniel Baum. The information presented here are intended for instructive purposes only and has been gathered from sources deemed reliable, though it may be subject to errors, omissions, changes or withdrawal without notice.
If you would like to republish this report on the web, please be sure to source it as the “Manhattan Rental Market Report” with a link back to its original location (http://www.tregny.com/manhattan_rental_market_report).
Categories: Manhattan
0 responses so far ↓
There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.
You must log in to post a comment.