Recently Viewed Apartments
Click the
to Save
| Download in PDF for a more readable, printer-friendly option |
On behalf of The Real Estate Group, I am pleased to present the July 2008 edition of our Manhattan Rental Market Report, the only research on the city’s rental rates published on a monthly basis.
In the past 19 months that we’ve been reporting data, the Manhattan rental market has seen its share of ups, downs, surprises and confusion, and I’ve witnessed some very interesting changes in the marketplace. This month, however, takes the cake! Never before have I, as a peripheral bystander, seen the kind of inexplicable phenomena happening as is occurring right now, which prompts the statement, “This just doesn’t make sense.”
There is more doorman inventory this month than we’ve seen in a long time, yet prices keep rising. Conversely, prices in non-doorman properties have come down, and inventories for those units have followed suit. But if it’s a widely-accepted fact that the market has, indeed, turned—even the largest companies concede, finally—why are prices continuing to increase in service buildings?
As I’m not an economist, I simply observe what’s before me and attempt to offer insight into market trends. With the market as off-kilter as it is this month, I must conclude that owners of doorman buildings are resistant to lowering prices and, instead, are offering incentives while actually increasing prices to offset those concessions. Unfortunately, this strategy appears to be backfiring, and inventories continue to mount as the season hits the midway point. My main concern is that these accumulating vacancies may not be absorbed even if prices are lowered—which is why, as we head into August, I strongly urge all property owners to take a hard look at their marketing plans for the subsequent months so as not to be overwhelmed by an excess of unrented units as the busy season comes to a close.
Sincerely,

Daniel Baum, C.O.O.
The Real Estate Group
|
Non-Doorman Buildings (Average Prices)
|
||
|
Most Expensive
|
Least Expensive
|
|
|
Studios
|
TriBeCa $2,921
|
Harlem $1,331
|
|
One-Bedrooms
|
TriBeCa $4,039
|
Harlem $1,767
|
|
Two-Bedrooms
|
TriBeCa $7,024
|
Harlem $2,300
|
|
Doorman Buildings (Average Prices)
|
||
|
Most Expensive
|
Least Expensive
|
|
|
Studios
|
TriBeCa $2,885
|
Harlem $1,337
|
|
One-Bedrooms
|
SoHo $5,124
|
Harlem $1,824
|
|
Two-Bedrooms
|
SoHo $7,128
|
Harlem $2,638
|
|
Non-Doorman Citywide Rents: July ’07 vs. July ’08
|
|||
|
July ’07
|
July ’08
|
Change
|
|
|
Studios
|
$2,169
|
$2,175
|
+0.3%
|
|
One-Bedrooms
|
$3,052
|
$2,842
|
-6.9%
|
|
Two-Bedrooms
|
$4,164
|
$4,019
|
-3.5%
|
|
Doorman Citywide Rents: July ’07 vs. July ’08
|
|||
|
July ’07
|
July ’08
|
Change
|
|
|
Studios
|
$2,689
|
$2,648
|
-1.5%
|
|
One-Bedrooms
|
$3,845
|
$3,825
|
-0.5%
|
|
Two-Bedrooms
|
$5,763
|
$5,769
|
+0.1%
|
*Year-over-year comparison does not include Harlem data
Inventories continue to climb in doorman buildings across the city…and so do prices—prices—While increased rents are typically indicative of heightened housing demand, data from July shows that this is not always the case. Neighborhoods where inventories are generally high saw rents rise, which is contrary to what one would expect. The greatest example of this was in the Financial District, where all doorman rental prices went up (by 3.3% for studios, 4.2% for one-bedrooms and 2.6% for two-bedrooms), in spite of accumulating vacancies.
Non-doorman inventories and prices, however, are down—Non-doorman rents, particularly in Manhattan’s trendier neighborhoods, are lower this month and so are vacancies. Popular areas such as Greenwich Village and the East Village, as well as SoHo and TriBeCa, experienced a decline in non-doorman prices, a trend that may be helping keep inventories tight and demand high for those units. Studio rents in particular decreased rather significantly, by as much as 4.6% in the East Village and 4.5% in SoHo.
Year-over-year changes in citywide rents display an overall weakness of the market—As seen in May and June, year-over-year comparisons of rental prices suggest that this year’s peak rental season is not as strong as that of 2007, and the sentiment surrounding July is no different. With only nominal increases for certain apartment sizes (0.3% for non-doorman studios and 0.1% for doorman two-bedrooms), average citywide rents fell from this time last year, most notably in non-doorman one-bedrooms, which decreased in price by 6.9%.
We reported a weakening of the market in August 2007 when, at the close of an especially strong rental season, landlords began offering the same kinds of concessions being seen today. While many were skeptical at the time, the downturn of the market is now clearly evidenced by the incentives that have been, and continue to be, provided throughout the summer of 2008.
Harlem—
Non-doorman one-bedrooms (0.8%), non-doorman two-bedrooms (4.4%)
Upper West Side—
Non-doorman studios (0.5%)
Upper East Side—
Doorman studios (1.4%), non-doorman one-bedrooms (3.7%), doorman one-bedrooms (0.9%), non-doorman two-bedrooms (1.2%)
Midtown West—
Non-doorman studios (2%), non-doorman one-bedrooms (0.9%)
Midtown East—
Non-doorman studios (6.1%), non-doorman one-bedrooms (3.3%), non-doorman two-bedrooms (4.8%), doorman two-bedrooms (5.3%)
Murray Hill—
Doorman two-bedrooms (5%)
Chelsea—
Doorman studios (1.6%), non-doorman one-bedrooms (5.6%), doorman one-bedrooms (2%), non-doorman two-bedrooms (1.8%)
Gramercy Park—
Doorman studios (2.9%), doorman one-bedrooms (2.1%), non-doorman two-bedrooms (4.9%)
Greenwich Village—
Non-doorman studios (1%), doorman studios (1.2%), non-doorman one-bedrooms (0.9%), non-doorman two-bedrooms (0.9%)
East Village—
Non-doorman studios (4.6%), non-doorman one-bedrooms (1.5%), non-doorman two-bedrooms (0.3%), doorman two-bedrooms (3%)
SoHo—
Non-doorman studios (4.5%), doorman studios (2%), non-doorman one-bedrooms (0.8%), non-doorman two-bedrooms (1.2%)
Lower East Side—
Non-doorman studios (2.5%), doorman one-bedrooms (7.2%)
TriBeCa—
Non-doorman studios (2.2%), non-doorman one-bedrooms (3.3%), non-doorman two-bedrooms (3.6%)
Financial District—
Non-doorman two-bedrooms (3.5%)
Battery Park City—
Doorman studios (1.4%), doorman one-bedrooms (1.2%)
Harlem—
Non-doorman studios (3.4%), doorman studios (3.7%), doorman one-bedrooms (0.8%), doorman two-bedrooms (0.1%)
Upper West Side—
Doorman studios (1.8%), non-doorman one-bedrooms (5.1%), doorman one-bedrooms (2.4%), non-doorman two-bedrooms (0.6%), doorman two-bedrooms (3.5%)
Upper East Side—
Non-doorman studios (0.7%), doorman two-bedrooms (4.9%)
Midtown West—
Doorman studios (0.7%), doorman one-bedrooms (2.1%), non-doorman two-bedrooms (0.5%), doorman two-bedrooms (4.5%)
Midtown East—
Doorman studios (3.2%), doorman one-bedrooms (0.4%)
Murray Hill—
Non-doorman studios (1.8%), doorman studios (1.6%), non-doorman one-bedrooms (0.6%), doorman one-bedrooms (3%), non-doorman two-bedrooms (6.4%)
Chelsea—
Non-doorman studios (1.3%), doorman two-bedrooms (1.8%)
Gramercy Park—
Non-doorman studios (4.8%), non-doorman one-bedrooms (1.1%), doorman two-bedrooms (1.9%)
Greenwich Village—
Doorman one-bedrooms (4%), doorman two-bedrooms (0.7%)
East Village—
Doorman studios (2%), doorman one-bedrooms (4.6%)
SoHo—
Doorman one-bedrooms (4.7%), doorman two-bedrooms (1.6%)
Lower East Side—
Doorman studios (0.8%), non-doorman one-bedrooms (5.1%), non-doorman two-bedrooms (4%), doorman two-bedrooms (5.8%)
TriBeCa—
Doorman studios (1.3%), doorman one-bedrooms (2.6%), doorman two-bedrooms (1.4%)
Financial District—
Non-doorman studios (6.6%), doorman studios (3.3%), non-doorman one-bedrooms (2.4%), doorman one-bedrooms (4.2%), doorman two-bedrooms (2.6%)
Battery Park City—
Doorman two-bedrooms (2.9%)
The Mean Rental Price graphs illustrate average monthly rents for studios, one-bedrooms and two-bedrooms in doorman and non-doorman buildings in Manhattan for the month of July 2008. Graphs tracking citywide and neighborhood price changes over a rolling 12-month period follow.







*2008 data includes Harlem










































As Harlem’s data is new to this report, these graphs only show Harlem rents in 2008 so far.



The Manhattan Rental Market Report is the only report that compares fluctuation in the city’s rental data on a monthly basis. It is an essential tool for potential renters seeking transparency in the NYC apartment market and a benchmark for landlords to efficiently and fairly adjust individual property rents in Manhattan.
The Manhattan Rental Market Report is based on data cross-sectioned from over 10,000 currently available listings located below 155th Street and priced under $10,000, with ultra-luxury property omitted to obtain a true monthly rental average. Our data is aggregated from the TREGNY proprietary database and sampled from a specific mid-month point to record current rental rates offered by landlords during that particular month. It is then combined with information from the REBNY Real Estate Listings Source (RLS), OnLine Residential (OLR.com) and R.O.L.E.X. (Real Plus).
Contact us now: 212.475.9000
Note: All market data is collected and compiled by The Real Estate Group’s marketing department and is overseen by C.O.O. Daniel Baum. The information presented here are intended for instructive purposes only and has been gathered from sources deemed reliable, though it may be subject to errors, omissions, changes or withdrawal without notice.
If you would like to republish this report on the web, please be sure to source it as the “Manhattan Rental Market Report” with a link back to its original location.
Categories: Manhattan
0 responses so far ↓
There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.
You must log in to post a comment.